I would, maybe, agree with training if it were free,but it ain`t.A cwl is already $76,so the whole deal discriminates against the poor,or those out of work,or on a small fixed income.Add training cost and a lotta folks can`t afford the license.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't even bother. I 100% agree with you and have pointed out how numerous states already require this and it hasn't turned into something outrageous but they won't listen. I personally would rather have a required safety course (too many retarded folks in our population) in exchange for more freedoms in where I carry, etc., but some people just can't grasp that concept. See my above post about the ridiculous slippery slope arguments I always hear.
I go to Georgia Tech (which as most of you may know is 2 seconds from the ghetto) The minute they let guns on campus I am moving up North. Do you realize that with guns on campus every crazy students who is pissed off about a test grade can go kill people?
middle of this argument on facebook
I had already discussed that bans on carry wont deter crime, another kid said it was another punishment that a criminal would consider, I told him if he already considered robbery/rape/murder etc the gun crime was already superseded so when that quote came up this was my responseThat is retarded! Thats right I said it. students who are angry about a test grade have no legal ability gained to threaten a professor from students LEGALLY carrying on campus. The only gained freedoms are for the student to protect themselves, not harm other innocent people. This quote makes me want to punch a liberal fool.
George if someone wants to kill you at Georgia Tech they aren't going to wait for guns to be allowed. But when that homicidal student comes onto campus, don't worry I'm sure duck and cover works
Recently a smoking ban in Atlanta Parks is currently up for vote. I donât smoke and I work in the health care field and advise against it. Outside in an open field paid and maintained for by the peoples taxes is now be considered by a panel vote for the parks to be off limits to smokers. Is this for second hand smoke inhalation? Or is it just another empowered person imposing their personal opinions/views on everyone else? What is next forced exercise and the banning of bacon? The precedence is being set to infringe on any freedom that a panel frowns upon.