Just curious why I often see "no xd pistols" in ads. I have had several and they were reliable with great ergos. Is it the higher bore axis and grip safety primarily that keeps people from liking them?
-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
why no xd?
- Thread starter sheep dog
- Start date
Cause they ******* suck.
They're $300 pistols, and every ******** thinks they're worth $650. That's why.
Edit: Grip Zone. Grip Zone!? Seriously?
And, to be more specific, I don't mind the XDm or XDs, but I would love NEVER buy one for what they're selling. They should be sold under Tristar in the $350 range, like the Turkish CZ clones.
They're $300 pistols, and every ******** thinks they're worth $650. That's why.
Edit: Grip Zone. Grip Zone!? Seriously?
And, to be more specific, I don't mind the XDm or XDs, but I would love NEVER buy one for what they're selling. They should be sold under Tristar in the $350 range, like the Turkish CZ clones.
Last edited:
My carry is an XD45. I have had no problems whatsoever with it. It fits me well. Glocks do not.
GRIP ZONE. My dislike is for all Springfield products. Thanks to @NWSharpshooter since his rant that opens my eyeson to their bs I can own one.
You must think glock is the only polymer pistol to own. I have several XD'S and never an issue out of them. I will buy any XD for $300. All of mine are very accurate
I agree they shoot great. I have also owned several of them and they were reliable and very accurate. I do not care for the high riding slide or the grip safety but it doesn't hinder the way they shoot. I haven't shot a Springfield that I didn't like.
I have owned a few XD's and thought they SUCKS, now on the other hand S/A 1911 are great pistols!
No. That would be either the PPQ or VP9.
