• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

Open Carry vs. Concealed?

Braxton1

Default rank <500 posts Supporter
Survivalist
10   0
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
471
Reaction score
401
Location
College Park, GA
So...is it just me or what?

Lately, I have been seeing a ton of folks walking around in public with either Outside-the-Waistband holsters or their gun just tucked in the waistband of their pants, fully-exposed to view. One guy in the Walmart even had a 33-round magazine hanging out of his Glock 19. (I actually had the opportunity to speak to him. I said, "If it's so dangerous to shop here that I need to be carrying THAT, I want to find another store!") Another guy had a Kydex chest rig on with a Beretta 92 in the convenience store that I visited yesterday in Jasper County.

I know lots of people have an issue with this style of carry because of the "public alarm" aspect, but my issue is this: Doesn't the public display of your firearm make you "Target #1" if someone is hell-bent on causing a problem? I would rather the perpetrator not know who the sheepdogs are until he is unpleasantly surprised (a la Elijah Dickens). I feel that concealed carry leaves me options during an emergency. I can gather my loved ones and make a move for the door OR I can engage if I have to. When I am designated as Target #1, my options become very limited.

Don't get me wrong. I am a big supporter of Constitutional Carry. This is not a gun rights issue for me. It's a TACTICS issue. In other words, it's not a "Can I do this?"; it's a "Should I do this?".
 
If I were a mass-murderer planning a public mass shooting,
I would pick a location where guns were banned, preferably by law but maybe just by store policy.
So that would NOT be a Wal-Mart, because around here WalMarts have signs that say CONCEALED carry is welcome.

But, if I identified such a location and went in guns a-blazing, of course any ARMED person I saw would be my one and only target until they were dead, dead, dead. I'd chase them down to find them and kill them.
Yes, that might buy the other victims time to flee, hide, or fight back against me by flanking or ambush.
But I'm just saying, the OP's premise is true in my mind: KILLERS PREFER UNARMED VICTIMS and any armed person must be killed first, so then the plan to massacre the helpless can continue.
 
Back
Top Bottom