- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 65,984
- Reaction score
- 74,129
When the head of DNR is an appointed position with no requirements other than connections needed.... well.... you can't expect too much, sadly.Oh and the spill that, If the sub committee and the upper echelon committee agrees, the DNR will support it for change gets you. Just remember, just b/c the DNR wants to do the right thing and supports something doesn't mean the political process will let the wheels turn. I fully support our DNR, I want the best for the state, but our DNR is so intricately woven into the political process that we can't say what we really think or do what really needs to be done for fear of pissing someone off. That's fact and that's a very slippery slope we are on. We are in bed so deep we can't piss the sheets for fear we'll have to sleep in it! I think our DNR does the best juggling act possible with the limited balls they are afforded. Read that twice, double meaning.
- - - Updated - - -
Haven't asked anywhere else.Just interested, what have you heard elsewhere on the web to this question posed?