Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Naturally, we gun owners would like to think that this armed veteran could have made a difference. In reality, I doubt that he could have. When Fox interviewed him, he stated that he was in a different building about 200 yards away from the shooting. Let's think about that. He leaves the building and is making his way across the open field to the scene of the shooting when law enforcement shows up. The campus is on lock down; so law enforcement sees only one guy with a gun outside running toward a building. The early reports would have probably said that two shooters were taken down by law enforcement. It would have been hours before we found out that a tragic mistake had been made.
In retrospect, he was not in position to assist; and it is probably better that he stayed right where he was.
I can't read that. Is there a link?People are fast on this Google Fu.
Be nice if the shooter's name was never mentioned and soon forgotten and the names of people like Chris Mintz were remembered.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/or...-veteran-chris-mintz-was-shot-7-times-n437291
A lot of gun control folks like to refer to Australia where, after a 1996 shooting, new gun control laws were passed. What I find more interesting is to read how they dealt with that perp. He became persona non grata. The courts won't even let the story of why he did the act be released. Without the 'promise' of fame, I believe many of these shootings would not occur. The perps want to think they'll be infamous. Take that away from them.