It's the citizens that are not outraged.
Since WHEN is 'reducing an officers EFFECTIVENESS' a reason to KILL someone??!!!WHAT?? I seriously hope you are NOT LEO.. Damn.. If it was ONE officer you MIGHT have a point about being disabled. But it wasn't ONE officer, it was a whole bunch of them, ONE officer having his 'effectiveness reduced slightly' should NOT mean a death sentence..
You dont really care what was in his hands? Good thing your not a cop (hopefully) becasue they GET PAID to care what folks have in their hands BEFORE THEY KILL THEM..
As far as your little scenario with a bad guy in my house at gunpoint who has pepper spray/tazer? To be the same thing as the raid the cops made I'd have 10 of my buddies there and support outside, so I dont think Id kill him and since I dont hang out with trigger happy killers, my buds wouldn't either. MY friends would take great joy in giving me hell and reenacting what I looked like getting my balls tazed off just after they bum rushed the guy.. Killing citizens should be a last resort, EVEN if they happen to be citizens who use drugs, sell drugs or are suspected of it.. I dont know whats worse, popo who shoot people or dogs when they dont need to or the civilians who aren't outraged by it..