My son, (15) has been shooting and hunting with me since he was 5. Recently he has expressed the desire to learn practical shooting and I am OK with it. I do not want to say he is super proficient, but he knows how to handle his firearms. This could also be a good excuse for me for doing it again.
I have direct experience with IDPA. There were two things that I really appreciated about IDPA. The first one was that it made me realize that I really did not know even the basics of how to use a pistol when under pressure. It really changed my mindset, and while I still don't want to be overconfident I think that the chances of shooting myself with my gun, if under attach, have dramatically decreased thanks to all the practice I did at that time. The other thing I liked about IDPA was that I had to use a standard production pistol and holster. That allowed me to become more proficient with the same tools that I was using every day for personal defense, and with the added benefit of not having to buy a dedicated firearm and additional accessories.
As far as USPSA is concerned, I am not really familiar with it, other than for the videos that I have watched on YouTube and that I think you have to use "fancy" pistols and optics. I have also the impression that there are more professional shooter in USPSA than in IDPA, but I may be wrong about that.
Both disciplines seem to be available at a couple of ranges near me, so I wanted to ask forum members who have experience with both disciplines. Which one would you chose for your son, based on (a) cost, (b) fun, (c) learning something that can be useful in real life, and (d) which one would be preferred if in the future he decides to try to become a "professional" competition shooter.
I have direct experience with IDPA. There were two things that I really appreciated about IDPA. The first one was that it made me realize that I really did not know even the basics of how to use a pistol when under pressure. It really changed my mindset, and while I still don't want to be overconfident I think that the chances of shooting myself with my gun, if under attach, have dramatically decreased thanks to all the practice I did at that time. The other thing I liked about IDPA was that I had to use a standard production pistol and holster. That allowed me to become more proficient with the same tools that I was using every day for personal defense, and with the added benefit of not having to buy a dedicated firearm and additional accessories.
As far as USPSA is concerned, I am not really familiar with it, other than for the videos that I have watched on YouTube and that I think you have to use "fancy" pistols and optics. I have also the impression that there are more professional shooter in USPSA than in IDPA, but I may be wrong about that.
Both disciplines seem to be available at a couple of ranges near me, so I wanted to ask forum members who have experience with both disciplines. Which one would you chose for your son, based on (a) cost, (b) fun, (c) learning something that can be useful in real life, and (d) which one would be preferred if in the future he decides to try to become a "professional" competition shooter.