- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 65,980
- Reaction score
- 74,127
Yep, that "inbred idiot" clearly missed a lucrative career in forensic pathology with his skills.You surely need to read between the lines in this. Here's the way I see it.
The DA wants you to believe that he stabbed, raped, and shot this lady in his ****ty trailer and messy garage with no DNA, blood spatter or brain matter that got on anything else. So he meticulously cleaned up everything? Yet at the same time he's on a property with a car crusher and a smelter and figured leaving the car in plain view and burning the body in a fire pit 10 yard from his house was a good idea. The Avery's are not likable for sure, but there are so many things wrong with this case it amazes me that 12 people could conclude "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that these guys did it. For gods sake the only thing they had on the kid was his own words, that changed every time they talked to him. Anyone that knows anything about psychology and interrogation would tell you they could have gotten that kid to swear he was out riding unicorns that night. Then his own lawyer sends an investigator to get him to confess again with an incredibly "leading" interview, while setting up a interview with Detectives to come and question him with no counsel present? Is that what you'd want to happen to your kid?
And they only had to conclude by a 'reasonable' doubt. The verdict is beyond bizarre and the comments of the dismissed juror very disturbing. But I'm sure it goes on every day in court rooms all around the country.