OK,
So I've been doing a fair amount of research in general, and there's a lot of really sketchy advice out there on the internet - but the current situation with powder supply means that getting the powders cited in a reloading manual can be a real problem.
Example - I went out to try and find a good general purpose 30 caliber powder - ideally that would be 'pretty good' for 30-06, 303 British, 308 Win and 7.62 Russian. IMR-4895 looks like a good candidate. Now, 4895 isn't impossible to get, but I'm cheap and don't like paying hazmat fees.
So I think - what are the alternatives? - and then you get to see just how personal some reloaders get with their choices. So I discovered burn rate charts.
Now, I love all my fingers, but I'm also pretty analytical, so I take a look at the charts and can see that recommendations for alternatives really are clustered around IMR-4895. Is that REALLY the primary determinent of what might be a good alternative?
If I check out this: https://hodgdon.com/wp-content/uploads/2023-burn-rate-chart.pdf - and look at entry 98, if I stay around that area in the chart (and load cautiously at first, checking for overpressure etc) - is that ALL there is to choosing alternatives?
So I've been doing a fair amount of research in general, and there's a lot of really sketchy advice out there on the internet - but the current situation with powder supply means that getting the powders cited in a reloading manual can be a real problem.
Example - I went out to try and find a good general purpose 30 caliber powder - ideally that would be 'pretty good' for 30-06, 303 British, 308 Win and 7.62 Russian. IMR-4895 looks like a good candidate. Now, 4895 isn't impossible to get, but I'm cheap and don't like paying hazmat fees.
So I think - what are the alternatives? - and then you get to see just how personal some reloaders get with their choices. So I discovered burn rate charts.
Now, I love all my fingers, but I'm also pretty analytical, so I take a look at the charts and can see that recommendations for alternatives really are clustered around IMR-4895. Is that REALLY the primary determinent of what might be a good alternative?
If I check out this: https://hodgdon.com/wp-content/uploads/2023-burn-rate-chart.pdf - and look at entry 98, if I stay around that area in the chart (and load cautiously at first, checking for overpressure etc) - is that ALL there is to choosing alternatives?