Please Vote - Considering Major Changes for Classifeds

Would charging non-supporters $1 a month to post in the classifieds hurt the site?

  • Yes, charging $1 a month would hurt the site and is a bad idea.

    Votes: 713 54.5%
  • No, $1 is cheap enough to not lose people over it.

    Votes: 596 45.5%

  • Total voters
    1,309
Status
Not open for further replies.
Make it a subscription service. Make it where some can't see glocks listed above what they feel they should be listed for. Make it where some can't see complaints about some folks listing glocks for more than they feel they should be listed for. Maybe a whiner tax seems there is more of that going on than anything.
 
I am at a point where you do what you have to do whether it’s a $1 a month or $10 a month I’m not paying it. I am tired of getting unfair negative feedback and you will not do anything about it. So I’m still on here as long as it’s free. You start charging and I’m gone.
This is the best argument for making it pay to play so far.
 
This is the best argument for making it pay to play so far.

It is a good argument. Along those lines, if I were paying just one penny for 10 long years, I would expect users to have the ability to close their own Wanted ad. Can't complain much if it's free, but I expect to see several improvements in functionality, in advance, if I am to pay anything at all.

But at least we currently have the ability to delete replies to our For Sale ads when idiot trolls turn an ad into a "discussion thread". And I'm not talking about legitimate questions about the item. I'm talking about the idiots who make offers in an ad and/or just start chatting, cluttering up someone's ad with nonsensical drivel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom