No, I’m afraid it went exactly as planned.lol...that guy knew exactly what he was doing and the new clarification of the same rule would have made no difference, other than maybe getting him arrested earlier.. I do believe that the timing of the serving of this warrant was actually to spell out and give an example of the new interpretation, but it went sideways on them and they can't use it now.
If you read the warrant affidavit and then look at the explanations of the interpretation of the rule...its almost like spelling it out for somebody..
His case was supposed to be an example, but it didn't work out the way they planned.