• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

Are you all supporting the NRA?

Reasons I am not a member of the treacherous NRA.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968
Passage of the Gun Control Act was initially prompted by the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy in 1963.[1] The President was shot and killed with a rifle purchased by mail-order from an ad in National Rifle Association (NRA) magazine American Rifleman.[2] Congressional hearings followed and a ban on mail-order gun sales was discussed, but no law was passed until 1968. At the hearings NRA Executive Vice-President Franklin Orth supported a ban on mail-order sales, stating, "We do not think that any sane American, who calls himself an American, can object to placing into this bill the instrument which killed the president of the United States."[3][4]

Precursors of the passage of the Gun Control Act were Senate Bill 1975 in 1963, "A Bill to Regulate the Interstate Shipment of Firearms," and Senate Bill 1592 in 1965, "A Bill to Amend the Federal Firearms Act of 1938." Both were introduced by Senator Thomas J. Dodd and met with fierce opposition on the floor but the bills also paved the way for the creation of the Gun Control Act of 1968.[5] [6]

The deaths of Martin Luther King Jr. in April 1968 and U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy in June 1968 renewed efforts to pass the bill.[3] On June 11, 1968, a tie vote in the House Judiciary Committee halted the bill's passage.[7] On reconsideration nine days later, the bill was passed by the committee. The Senate Judiciary Committee similarly brought the bill to a temporary halt, but as in the House, it was passed on reconsideration.(8) House Resolution 17735, known as the Gun Control Act, was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968[9] banning mail order sales of rifles and shotguns and prohibiting most felons, drug users and people found mentally incompetent from buying guns.[10][11]


https://timeline.com/nra-machine-guns-1986-265cb939c77c
But in order to win votes among Democratic congressional votes, however, the NRA was forced to abandon an entire category of firearm: machine guns. According to the amendment, introduced at the last minute by New Jersey House Democrat William Hughes, any civilian possession of machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986?—?of which there are still 193,000 in circulation today?—?could be prosecuted. Already existing machine guns would be closely tracked by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

The NRA played the sacrifice as virtually meaningless. “I remember very well having dinner…with Wayne LaPierre on the big victory after it passed the House,” said former NRA lobbyist Richard Feldman. “And we weren’t too concerned about the machine gun issue.” But the decision set a precedent, especially for a powerful lobby that increasingly prided itself on zero Second Amendment compromises.


https://www.nraila.org/articles/20171005/nras-wayne-lapierre-and-chris-cox-issue-joint-statement



I am a member of SAF (https://www.saf.org), FPC (https://www.firearmspolicy.org) and GCO (https://www.georgiacarry.org) none of which use certain gun categories or gun accessories as sacrificial bargaining chips. None of them pay their chief executive a $5-million dollar annual salary and provides them with a multi mullion dollar luxury jet.

Great information. Thanks for the post.
 
palmettomoon palmettomoon really just curious here...if they dump Wayne and Chris, would you reconsider? Man, that sounds so salesy...no I don't work for the NRA haha I just didn't know how to better phrase that question.
I'd like to see most of the self perpetuated board members removed along with their friends and family members from any paid positions in the org. Remove Wayne, Chris and have the remaining grass roots ticket BOD members elect a leader from a field of candidates selected by Life members in an election. Maybe then I'd reactivate.
 
He did leave, resigned in 2019. I didn’t realize it. They still need a solid restructuring and new blood.

Yup, they will need to be rebuilt from the ground up. Pretty much all the BoD and executives need to go away and restart with people who actually care.

The good news is that by throwing themselves into Ch 11, a judge can change that into Ch 7 and appoint a trustee to restructure the whole organization. The bad news is a judge can appoint a trustee to restructure the whole organization. It would all depend on who is appointed.

There's going to be some interesting legal moves coming up for the NRA. For example, I heard on a legal podcast that the TX judge could remand the whole thing back to NY. The whole Ch 11 thing in TX is mainly because it takes it out of the NY Atty General's control.

But if there are criminal charges in NY that would change things. Also, one of the NRA's biggest historical donors is suing in TX court to have the bankruptcy changed to Ch 7 due to fraud. And a board member is petitioning the TX bankruptcy court to have a trustee put in charge as well, which keeps things open in TX.

It's a complete mess and it means the NRA is useless until it all gets straightened out or they simply go kaput.
 
Unfortunately, I had to sign up to be a part of a gun club that hasn't done away with the NRA chit bags yet, it's in the works but until then I had to have a membership. Voting the NRA out is currently in the works.
 
Back
Top Bottom