• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

Triggers

Double action is when the first trigger pull will cock the hammer, and pulling it all the way will release the hammer and fire the round. Some revolvers are the same way.

A single-action means you have to cock the hammer to get ready to fire. The 1911 is like this. Most people carry a 1911 "cocked and locked" which is with the hammer in the cocked position and the safety on to keep it from firing. After the first round is fired, a 1911 will re-cock itself and be ready to fire again. Of course, a Beretta 92 will also, so really this difference only applies to how the first round is discharged.

-Both have their strengths and weaknesses, and both have been through ups and downs of popularity. There was a time when a 1911 was cheap and not well-regarded. 1911s are worth a fortune these days. also, 9mm is a bit less in favor than it used to be-due to the current popularity of the .40. Back in 1990, you would have been a fool not to have run right out and gotten a 10mm. Pay no attention to this herd mentality. I have seen many of these cycles and you will too-if you follow guns for a few decades or so.

I laugh at the fact that a lot of people call the 9mm a "mouse round" nowadays. It is funny to me that people think only a .40 or .45 can kill you. Just look at a little history, an you will see that the nazis killed hell out of literally million with 9mm. The round works. So does a .38 for that matter. I can remember all the way back to the day that most cops carried .38 every day-in a (blasphemy) revolver!

My theory is to find a pistol you like, learn to shoot well, and shoot a lot. Personally, my favorite pistol of right now is my 9mm Glock 19. I like having no switches or hammers to fool with. Nothing to remember, just pull the trigger-and keep pulling until it is empty. Many may scold me for my "idiot gun" or "mouse pistol" or "plastic trash." Whatever. I like it. It feels good, and I have been an avid shooter for the last 35 years, so I have enough experience to know what I like, and yes, I do know what all those knobs and switches on all the sigs and S&Ws and so forth are for.

One of the great things about firearms for me is that there is something for everyone. The 1911 is fun to shoot, but I don't carry it. The Glock may feel cheap and strange to some people-that's O.K. The $800 sig may be perfect for some people, the $1000 HK may float some other guy's boat. What I like now may change in a year or two as well. There are so many ways to skin a cat. You should hang out at the range, maybe even rent a few different semis, and you will find one you enjoy. That is what you should settle on, even if it is a currently out-of-favor "mousegun" or revolver.

*There is a strong motivation amongst gun owners to have the "latest and greatest " to show all their pals. This is what I believe drives these popularity cycles. Personally, I don't care at all about impressing someone with my shiny new gun. I would rather take my beat up old model 12 shotgun to a dove field and impress then with a pile of dead birds rather than 5 boxes of empty shells.

One of the best post I have read. Good job man!
 
Double action is when the first trigger pull will cock the hammer, and pulling it all the way will release the hammer and fire the round. Some revolvers are the same way.

A single-action means you have to cock the hammer to get ready to fire. The 1911 is like this. Most people carry a 1911 "cocked and locked" which is with the hammer in the cocked position and the safety on to keep it from firing. After the first round is fired, a 1911 will re-cock itself and be ready to fire again. Of course, a Beretta 92 will also, so really this difference only applies to how the first round is discharged.

-Both have their strengths and weaknesses, and both have been through ups and downs of popularity. There was a time when a 1911 was cheap and not well-regarded. 1911s are worth a fortune these days. also, 9mm is a bit less in favor than it used to be-due to the current popularity of the .40. Back in 1990, you would have been a fool not to have run right out and gotten a 10mm. Pay no attention to this herd mentality. I have seen many of these cycles and you will too-if you follow guns for a few decades or so.

I laugh at the fact that a lot of people call the 9mm a "mouse round" nowadays. It is funny to me that people think only a .40 or .45 can kill you. Just look at a little history, an you will see that the nazis killed hell out of literally millions with 9mm. The round works. So does a .38 for that matter. I can remember all the way back to the day that most cops carried .38 every day-in a (blasphemy) revolver!

My theory is to find a pistol you like, learn to shoot well, and shoot a lot. Personally, my favorite pistol of right now is my 9mm Glock 19. I like having no switches or hammers to fool with. Nothing to remember, just pull the trigger-and keep pulling until it is empty. Many may scold me for my "idiot gun" or "mouse pistol" or "plastic trash." Whatever. I like it. It feels good, and I have been an avid shooter for the last 35 years, so I have enough experience to know what I like, and yes, I do know what all those knobs and switches on all the sigs and S&Ws and so forth are for.

One of the great things about firearms for me is that there is something for everyone. The 1911 is fun to shoot, but I don't carry it. The Glock may feel cheap and strange to some people-that's O.K. The $800 sig may be perfect for some people, the $1000 HK may float some other guy's boat. What I like now may change in a year or two as well. There are so many ways to skin a cat. You should hang out at the range, maybe even rent a few different semis, and you will find one you enjoy. That is what you should settle on, even if it is a currently out-of-favor "mousegun" or revolver.

*There is a strong motivation amongst gun owners to have the "latest and greatest " to show all their pals. This is what I believe drives these popularity cycles. Personally, I don't care at all about impressing someone with my shiny new gun. I would rather take my beat up old model 12 shotgun to a dove field and impress then with a pile of dead birds rather than 5 boxes of empty shells.

Damnit man! That was an epic post! You hit the nail on the head with that one. I agree 100%. It's interesting that you mention the 9MM's use during the second World War. Something that I have to add to that would be that the Natzi's were carrying around 7mm before that which only fortifies your argument. There was a debate somewhere on here where some guy was venting about people kidding him about his girlfriend's .380, to which he replied "If all it's going to do is piss you off, then I dare you to stand in front of her as she discharges it". It just goes along with your argument as well.

There are indeed crazes of the next big thing as this is the way people tend to be. Like you say these days it's about carrying a freakin cannon with you as a CW. So like yourself, I say "to each his own".

I prefer revolvers. I carried an LCR for a while. I may pick up another or perhaps an SP101. I have a Blackhawk as an all around truck/home gun. Yeah it's single action. Yeah it's a revolver. But the truth is I know that it's going to go "bang" every time and with each bang I know where each round is going. Any way you slice it how's that saying go? "Beware of the man with only one gun,".

Getting back on subject I really appreciate the info man. Thanks a lot and again epic post!
 
Last edited:
I am just a believer in practice and comfort. I have always been a person who is more comfortable shooting a 9mm than a .40, or a .38 than a .357.

I don't like crazy recoil, and I don't want to miss. I think my chances of a hit are better with a 9mm I am comfortable with than a .40 or .357 which can make me flinch. A miss is a miss, no matter whether it comes from a freaking supercharged hand cannon or a "mousegun."

Great point about the .380. I wouldn't volunteer to get shot by one either. There is simply a lot of bad info floating around these days. The .40 is definitely too powerful for some people to shoot well, and I would much rather be responsible for placing a good hit of any caliber than a clean miss of a larger one.
 
I think last nights episode was a little better than the first. They did spend more time talking about the weapon of topic: the M1 Garand. The format really messes me up though. They start off with the basics and show how the "combat rifle" evolved into the Garand but somehow finish with a L11A? How does that work? Seems like they would continue on past the Garand with modern day "combat rifles". I know that term could be open to interpretaion but to me it would generally mean close-quarter to a little larger distance combat. A Sniper Rifle would be just that, a Sniper Rifle. After all if they had started the show talking about a Scoped 1903 Springfield then I could understand the end result a little better? Still a good, informative show. Was glad that they threw in that tid-bit about GI's tossing the empty clip onto the ground to confuse the enemy. Remember hearing my Grandfather talk about doing that. Thoughts on the show?
 
Back
Top Bottom