- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
- Messages
- 27,446
- Reaction score
- 108,062
I honestly don't know. I'm a little biased towards Springfield I had one and it was crap a real jamb-o-matic. I know that is not the norm.
-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
Springfield just released new 1911 for u 1911 fans!
- Thread starter nitrousfedlx
- Start date
I honestly don't know. I'm a little biased towards Springfield I had one and it was crap a real jamb-o-matic. I know that is not the norm.
Maybe I'm not tacticool but I don't want a 1911 with a damn rail on the frame.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2010
- Messages
- 7,031
- Reaction score
- 9,501
Looks like they resurected Armand Swenson.
I like what they're trying to do and there's no one-size-fits-all, so there's things I like and things I don't like. The rail fits the theme although I'd rather not have it and I'm not a fan of the U-sights. I'd have to hold one but the grip panels look thin, I'd prefer more of a swell on mine. But the kicker for me is the stainless frame. You know I won't own anything not "lightweight" but I know that's also personal preference...
I really do like the square trigger guard with the flat trigger! Safari arms did square trigger guards with a finger tab.
Yeah dude, like u and letusbuyyourcar, I'm not a fan of a rail on a 1911 but on this particular 1911, it fits the overall theme pretty good!
Looks like another reinvention of the wheel. Or a solution to a problem that does not exist.
I personally look at it more of an astethics thing. Lol
I had a Caspian commander size build in the late 90s with a squarish trigger guard and a very pronounced finger groove right below it. Man, I miss that pistol.
I like the rail and lazer/light combo on my 1911'ish 
my eyes ain't what they used to be.
my eyes ain't what they used to be.
