PDW brace question

[NotEli]

Quick question: Will the ATF shoot my friend's dog and throw them in prison if their unregistered pistol has a collapsible brace attached, but with the tailhook removed? Like so:

 

[Control for Smilers]

Quick question: Will the ATF shoot my friend's dog and throw them in prison if their unregistered pistol has a collapsible brace attached, but with the tailhook removed? Like so:

View attachment 5383202

100% yes. they LOVE shooting dogs.

 

[Bypass]

I said it a long time ago that everyone was shouldering their braces at the range it would only be a matter of time before they were made illegal- Nostradamus

 

[NotEli]

I guess my question is, is this still considered a pistol brace if it doesnt have the tailhook (the part that allows the firearm to be fire "1 handed")? Without the tail hook its just some collapsible thingy-ma-bobber

 

[letusbuyyourcar]

Quick question: Will the ATF shoot my friend's dog and throw them in prison if their unregistered pistol has a collapsible brace attached, but with the tailhook removed? Like so:

View attachment 5383202

You never know and neither do they until they show up. It's a dice roll being played with multiple personality bullies. So don't gamble on which personality or day of the week you might get.

 

[letusbuyyourcar]

I guess my question is, is this still considered a pistol brace if it doesnt have the tailhook (the part that allows the firearm to be fire "1 handed")? Without the tail hook its just some collapsible thingy-ma-bobber

And that's all it has to be for them to get their panties all bunched up.

 

[NotEli]

And that's all it has to be for them to get their panties all bunched up.

Fair enough lol

 

[Control for Smilers]

I guess my question is, is this still considered a pistol brace if it doesnt have the tailhook (the part that allows the firearm to be fire "1 handed")? Without the tail hook its just some collapsible thingy-ma-bobber

yes, because a tailhook COULD be reinstalled. and I bet the LOP is still the same without the hook. and the brace frame itself is not needed for the firearm to function.

 

[Control for Smilers]

for the record...it is all infringement. but that is how the rule is written.

 

[BigMike]

If anything is attached to the rear of a gun that is not required to be there for the operation of said gun, 99.9% certain it's unlawful. Side note, what did that come off of?

Brace setups can still.have value after registration, especially that one. Battle Arms Development makes a stock that will attach where the gearhead piece came off.