Just a dumb question.
Where were you when this was being done?
I think I would notice it on my property.
Where were you when this was being done?
I think I would notice it on my property.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be a stumbling block for buyer to get title insurance when survey reveals said encroachment
Just a dumb question.
Where were you when this was being done?
I think I would notice it on my property.
If I understand correctly about all of it is that if you claim your property at least once each 7 years by taping/cordoning/etc. it offsets the encroacher's 'claim' and cannot be realized as legal. I remember in Old Roswell by the old theater where part of a parking lot was subject to this kind of encroachment and they roped off that part of the encroached area to keep whoever the squatter was off legal standing.....
I defer to you on the specifics most certainly. I only relate what I saw and was aware of in that old part of Roswell at the old Theater. I think they actually roped off the area every year for a day. I guess if I ever got into a situation where effective encroachment was happening, I'd be asking the county why they aren't charging the encroacher property tax for the taken land...The prescriptive easement can be created in less than 7 years. There is no exact time period. The best example I can think of is a family cemetery. If you are letting people cross your land to access a cemetery, courts (juries) are going to find a prescriptive easement in a shorter period of time.
We had a recent case in Athens where the public had been allowed to park in what appeared to on street parking for like 30-40 years. Then the owners wanted to make the parking private. The city claimed a prescriptive easement in the parking spaces. Every court that considered the matter, including the Georgia Supreme Court, ruled that the parking had been permissive (allowed by the owners) and the city had never asserted a claim adverse to the ownership interests of the owners, so no public parking. Another $100,000 in legal fees the city had to pay.
the tactic you mention is legal and effective, but personally, I would not take the risk of waiting on any certain time period to pass once it was established that possession (use) was adverse to my ownership interests, which OP has neatly done.
Be aware, that the owner may be entitled to money damages, but the equitable remedy of requiring removal of the encroachment depends on a balancing of the interests, and delay in enforcing the remedy can affect the extent to which it is enforced. In essence a court could force you to sell the land that is encroached, and leave the encroachment,.
amazing how stupid it can get in a short amount of time but we gotz experts on everything known to manBe dang glad this its just a driveway and not his cat after reading that other thread. Things can really get out of hand then.