For us Grammar Nazis

[righter13]

 

[militaryrednek]

[Broken External Image]:

 

[righter13]

[Broken External Image]:

I see what you did there....

 

[kuduman]

Should be "looses they're minds" for even more effect. That one irritates me-- Neal Boortz got it wrong at least four times a week on his "Neal's Newz" page. Never mind "sell" for "sale", "Might of" for "might have", lesser/fewer used incorrectly, affect/effect used improperly, or "It's" when not the contraction of "it is".

Some people say they could care less. And they're wrong.

 

[Bypass]

Should be "looses they're minds" for even more effect. That one irritates me-- Neal Boortz got it wrong at least four times a week on his "Neal's Newz" page. Never mind "sell" for "sale", "Might of" for "might have", lesser/fewer used incorrectly, affect/effect used improperly, or "It's" when not the contraction of "it is".

Some people say they could care less. And they're wrong.

Uh no, it is loses.

 

[kuduman]

Of course it is "loses". You miss my point-- for more humorous effect, it should incorrectly be spelled "looses".

It's not funny when you have to explain it.

 

[dbienfait]

Uh no, it is loses.

X2 ahahahahahahaahaha this is hilarious

 

[Mk1a]

The "could care less" part was intentional too, right? It's like fingernails on a chalkboard. Nicely done.

 

[rOmiLaYu]

Some people say they could care less. And they're wrong.

 

[rOmiLaYu]

Uh no, it is loses.