I got this newsletter from the CMP the other day.
Check out this photo, of a person shooting an M1 Garand at the rifle range at
Camp Perry, OH (the targets are on the edge of a cliff overlooking Lake Erie, so a special cordoned-off area of the lake is the "backstop" in use here).
The person's rifle looks elevated 30 degrees above horizontal.
Yet he just fired a shot-- the empty case just ejected and is only 2 feet away, flying thu the air.
Even from the unsupported standing position, an M1 doesn't have that much muzzle rise due to recoil, and maximum recoil movement wouldn't have happened this quickly anyway-- the shooter's mass would mean that the fired case should be a lot farther away by the time his body was rocked back to the highest point of muzzle climb.
Is this pic photoshopped, do you think?
Did they snap a pic of a shooter about to settle into a firing stance, and then add the shell case later to "fake" a photo of what they wanted to portray?
Check out this photo, of a person shooting an M1 Garand at the rifle range at
Camp Perry, OH (the targets are on the edge of a cliff overlooking Lake Erie, so a special cordoned-off area of the lake is the "backstop" in use here).
The person's rifle looks elevated 30 degrees above horizontal.
Yet he just fired a shot-- the empty case just ejected and is only 2 feet away, flying thu the air.
Even from the unsupported standing position, an M1 doesn't have that much muzzle rise due to recoil, and maximum recoil movement wouldn't have happened this quickly anyway-- the shooter's mass would mean that the fired case should be a lot farther away by the time his body was rocked back to the highest point of muzzle climb.
Is this pic photoshopped, do you think?
Did they snap a pic of a shooter about to settle into a firing stance, and then add the shell case later to "fake" a photo of what they wanted to portray?