Brace Ban Dec 28, 2022.

[300_whisper]

We are going to start a go fund me account to help with your speech impediments. Unfortunately no amount of money can fix the retardation of those that think giving a inch will stop the gun control nuts from wanting a mile

But, but, but bump stocks are stupid! You just don’t understand!!

 

[Red Squirrel 556]

 

[BHPSteel]

The thing with bump stocks is that most of us would say "it's just an accessory that most of us would probably not want".

The trouble is that it sets a precedent, based on legislators' imaginations. The bump stock allows mass murderers to shoot more people, leading to more deaths. More deaths is bad, right?

What else allows mass murderers to kill more people with their guns? Good shot placement. Maybe the key to solving the terrible record of mass slayings is to make it harder for the killers to achieve good shot placement by reducing the effectiveness of their aiming. Let's start restricting those kinds of accessories too.

Now with the bump stock ban there's a precedent for taking an accessory away from gun owners because they allow mass murderers to be more effective. You wake up one day and red dots become illegal unless you're a cop.

That's the problem. It's not bump stocks. It's the continuing and amplified calls for inanimate objects to be outlawed based on feewings.

 

[Red Squirrel 556]

No..listen up…a “bump stock” is a novelty item and an easy argument for the logically retarded left.

There isn’t one video on a legitimate firearms enthusiast that’s employs the usefulness behind this such tech and it’s real world value.

I understand the argument that “this loss is momentum in taking the rest away” but it’s absurd. It’s like saying the chineese dollar store product is better than something meant to have real use for US real end users.

As far as the comment For “oh, well the company who made bumpstocks may have cared” …maybe those folks should have invested in making real waves in the industry like a better mousetrap and not something that put a target on the back of responsible citizens.

The same argument exists for diesel owners and the their use of clean, efficient tunes to improve their diesel vehicles that have since been force fed the bs ultimatum from other inept alphabet agencies because of a few feckin idiots posting videos of RoLLiNG CoAL….with their dirty craptastic junkers.

All I’m saying is this logic below should be, instead, better used to bolster something like H.R. 95. The Hearing Protection Act to make suppressors legal for responsible gun owners and their communities to shoot more safely and comfortably. Rather than worry about some bs useless novelty “bolt on” that has no inherent value for conscientious, safe, effective use of firearms across America.

Sure thing bootlicker.

 

[300_whisper]

Sure thing bootlicker.

Ouch…a little on the nose, good sir.

 

[300_whisper]

The thing with bump stocks is that most of us would say "it's just an accessory that most of us would probably not want".

The trouble is that it sets a precedent, based on legislators' imaginations. The bump stock allows mass murderers to shoot more people, leading to more deaths. More deaths is bad, right?

What else allows mass murderers to kill more people with their guns? Good shot placement. Maybe the clue is to make it harder for them to achieve good shot placement by reducing the effectiveness of their aiming. Let's start restricting those kinds of accessories too.

And suddenly, red dots become highly regulated. And now with the bump stock ban there's a precedent for taking an accessory away from gun owners because they allow mass murderers to be more effective.

That's the problem. It's not bump stocks. It's the continuing and amplified calls for inanimate objects to be outlawed based on feewings.

But red dots are stupid. Come on, man. You don’t need to aim.

 

[BHPSteel]

But red dots are stupid. Come on, man. You don’t need to aim.

True. I just point my shotgun in the air and fire a couple of blasts.

 

[Soul]

No..listen up…a “bump stock” is a novelty item and an easy argument for the logically retarded left.

There isn’t one video on a legitimate firearms enthusiast that’s employs the usefulness behind this such tech and it’s real world value.

I understand the argument that “this loss is momentum in taking the rest away” but it’s absurd. It’s like saying the chineese dollar store product is better than something meant to have real use for US real end users.

As far as the comment For “oh, well the company who made bumpstocks may have cared” …maybe those folks should have invested in making real waves in the industry like a better mousetrap and not something that put a target on the back of responsible citizens.

The same argument exists for diesel owners and the their use of clean, efficient tunes to improve their diesel vehicles that have since been force fed the bs ultimatum from other inept alphabet agencies because of a few feckin idiots posting videos of RoLLiNG CoAL….with their dirty craptastic junkers.

All I’m saying is this logic below should be, instead, better used to bolster something like H.R. 95. The Hearing Protection Act to make suppressors legal for responsible gun owners and their communities to shoot more safely and comfortably. Rather than worry about some bs useless novelty “bolt on” that has no inherent value for conscientious, safe, effective use of firearms across America.

People like you is who raised todays weak populace. People like you bartered our rights away when you yourself were young. People like you are the root, cause, and perpetuation of our problems. Not just with gun rights but with every single rights that have to do with self agency.

 

[JDUB]

People like you is who raised todays weak populace. People like you bartered our rights away when you yourself were young. People like you are the root, cause, and perpetuation of our problems. Not just with gun rights but with every single rights that have to do with self agency.

You prob still have these in your cars…don’t you?

 

[Red Squirrel 556]

Ouch…a little on the nose, good sir.

Anybody thats ok with the confiscation of legally purchased items from a citizen just because some jackass made a new law to satisfy a bunch of people, is exactly that.

"They wuz stoopid anywayz" isnt a good enough excuse for me.