Soooooo why would the NFL continue to push the same teams winning? You would generate more money and interest having parody every year.Not our incompetent government.
The efficiently run money generating NFL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Soooooo why would the NFL continue to push the same teams winning? You would generate more money and interest having parody every year.Not our incompetent government.
The efficiently run money generating NFL.
It’s already parody.Soooooo why would the NFL continue to push the same teams winning? You would generate more money and interest having parody every year.
There's no reason to rig it. It's a propaganda platform where winners are those pushing agendas and losers are the US Constitution and the American people.I don't think it's "fixed" as in predetermined outcomes because that would just require a massively coordinated effort considering it's pure size and scope.
I do believe that the NFL/TV syndicate likes to nudge things in the general direction that they want them to go.
A few questionable calls here and a few blown calls there can completely change the course and tempo of a game.
So no I don't think the games are predetermined...except for the Falcons throwing the superbowl. That one was too oblivious to hide.
Money…not eyeballs.They don't care who wins, they just want your eyeballs.
Of course, and that comes from eyeballs. It's a two pronged attack. Rake in money and push a political narrative. If you consume NFL football, you're "helping" on both fronts.Money…not eyeballs.
It all be about the almighty dollar !!
And yet you're probably going to vote for a guy this year that would put you in Jail for 10 years for owning a piece of plastic that goes back and forth.There's a significant difference between being "triggered" and responding irrationally, than by understanding the NFL and associated entertainers are using their platform to undermine gun rights and therefore, not supporting them. No?
View attachment 6874934
I'll vote for the creature that most closely aligns with my views. After candidates are selected, it's the most logical decision there is. If I have philosophical differences, the time to expend energy to get a better candidate on the ballot is prior to the general election. What's a better option? Voting for the even MORE anti-gun candidate? Not voting and handing a vote to the worst of the two? There's a time for strategy, and the voting booth is one of them. I'll never be able to vote for a candidate that aligns with me on every issue, especially my VERY black and white view of the 2A, but I'll use the options at my disposal to do the best I can. That includes voting. Apathy and cynicism won't win the war, or keep the wolves at bay.And yet you're probably going to vote for a guy this year that would put you in Jail for 10 years for owning a price of plastic that goes back and forth.