You don't seriously expect ANYONE with an ounce of common sense to trust ANYTHING the FBI reports, do you?"You cant commit hate crimes against white people"
That's not what the FBI reported in 2017.
View attachment 2971549
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't seriously expect ANYONE with an ounce of common sense to trust ANYTHING the FBI reports, do you?"You cant commit hate crimes against white people"
That's not what the FBI reported in 2017.
View attachment 2971549
You can LITERALLY NOTYou can literally look up videos of white people doing the same exact thing. Nice try though.
You must live in a cave
Both of our kids will grow up as minorities in the US. One of us realizes this
I'm not saying it didn't cause all that damage, i'm just referring to the wall below the window.
(I'm no expert but I was with an EOD task force back in 2004. I've seen dozens of explosions and survived 4 directly. In my experience, that wall damage is not consistent with the blast pattern.)
Let's think logically...
Look at the video and pause it when it shows the window from the inside. Look at the wall below the window. If the explosion occurred at the window (as the burn spot indicates) the wall below wouldn't be affected. If the explosion occurred after the mortar passed the window threshold, the wall would have minor shrapnel at best and the majority of the damage would be inside the wall (not have the drywall ripped out on the floor). It looks like someone did that damage to the wall before or after the firework went off. Given that there's zero powder burn on anything other than the window landing, the mortar had to explode just inside the window. It doesn't add up.
To cause damage to the drywall like that, the explosion would have had to occur outside of the house and sent some sort of projectile through the wall.
I'm sure there's somebody else in here familiar with explosives.
So 13% of population is responsible for 23.9% of hate crimes. Was that a point you were trying to make? Are you racist or something?
Do not deflect. You had said that Trump spent years urging hate crimes. I said he did not and that you could not prove it. Your examples showed that Trump did not urge hate crimes, and you still cannot be intellectualy honest.
No one is denying that hate crimes exist, that all races perpetrate them. Some races commit more hate crimes than their share of overall population.
You can LITERALLY NOT
So 13% of population is responsible for 23.9% of hate crimes. Was that a point you were trying to make? Are you racist or something?
If you actually looked at the stats, you'd see the difference. But I highly doubt you'd do that.
Who's more dangerous... a person that kills 10 people, or 10 people that killed 10 people in 10 completely unrelated situations? What's more logical... someone that kills another person over an argument... or someone that walks into a church and kills people? How about someone that kills because they're in a rival gang.... vs someone who kills innocent people because they're in a white supremacist gang?
The NATURE of the crime and the reason speaks volumes. But you'll happily ignore that if it makes you feel better.
White people account for 99% of mass shootings and 84% of familicides. And lead in all heinous crimes such as assault on police, police homicide, bodily mutilation and sex offenses (look it up). But let's ignore that the most deadly and dangerous class (even reported by the FBI) are white males. Let's ignore history that shows white men have killed far more than any other race. Let's ignore things like the Tulsa Massacre, the Osage bombing, the thousands of black churches attacked, the hundreds of school shootings, and all that if it makes you feel like you're right.