• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

Remington getting sued??

Not only is this ignorant. But the article states “he (Lanza) used a semi automatic weapon that had been sold to his mother” then later states that “lawyers for the victims family say that Lanza, the perpetrator of the crime, was encouraged by the marketing campaign to choose his weapon of choice and that under Connecticut law they have the legal right to bring the claim against the manufacturer.” This can’t possibly make any sense in a legal battle, he couldn’t have chosen a gun based on advertisement if he didn’t buy it, he obtained it from his mother’s house so he didn’t have a choice on what firearm manufacturer he used.

This is one of the stupidest claims or arguments I have ever seen.
 
Not only is this ignorant. But the article states “he (Lanza) used a semi automatic weapon that had been sold to his mother” then later states that “lawyers for the victims family say that Lanza, the perpetrator of the crime, was encouraged by the marketing campaign to choose his weapon of choice and that under Connecticut law they have the legal right to bring the claim against the manufacturer.” This can’t possibly make any sense in a legal battle, he couldn’t have chosen a gun based on advertisement if he didn’t buy it, he obtained it from his mother’s house so he didn’t have a choice on what firearm manufacturer he used.

This is one of the stupidest claims or arguments I have ever seen.

Not to mention, the families dont actually care about justice. They care about a payout. Go after the school? Go after the lanza estate? Nope, go after the Big B illion dollar company.
 
Back
Top Bottom