You implied it was easyyup but its happened before right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You implied it was easyyup but its happened before right?
The 9th amendment is different from the 2nd, in that the 2nd specifically list arms meaning firearms and States shall not be infringed. The 9th does not specify that your right to own a automobile could not be infringedI believe the 9th amendment covers that.
Pointless argument. You said there was no right to drive. I said I believe the 9th covers it.The 9th amendment is different from the 2nd, in that the 2nd specifically list arms meaning firearms and States shall not be infringed. The 9th does not specify that your right to own a automobile could not be infringed
Pointless argument. You said there was no right to drive. I said I believe the 9th covers it
Now you appear to agree but that it can be infringed? Are you trying to argue just for the sake of it?
I agree in point about the 9th, but I am saying your right to own a firearm is greater than your right to drive. In every state you have to get permission in the form a drivers license to drive(it is not a right if you have to get petmission). You have to also pass a written test as well as a drive test. Most state don't require a license to own a firearm. Or a performance test. Pretty much you have a right to do anything that isn't forbid by law. That is not that same as a right spelled out specifically.
We the people have by consent given Government authority, i.e partial sovereignty ,our sovereignty that we may be judged by the Law. This is very much like the original Covenant of the Hebrews and Levitical Law.
Just as they learned long ago, the letter of the Law kills, the Spirit gives life. They cried out give us a King.
Unalienable right means just that. You cannot give it away, it belongs to you by right, your very existence is evidence of it. I know some will argue that we have signed away that right by contract. I know every argument regarding the God given rights of men, and women and how we/they have given away those rights. I have always found it interesting the people who believe those rights apply only to people born in a specific geographical location.The only consent that the citizenry gave the government to violate their unalienable Rights is via the Socialist Surveillance Number aka a Social Security Number. That now serves as de facto proof that the holder of the SSN is a subject of the illegal / de facto government that requires you to obtain permission to do that which you already had a Right to do.