No, one could not assume that. Apples and oranges.
Is that your way of conceding?
If you are going to use your mad Google-fu skills to combat my argument, at least have the decency to give me a synopsis of the article. I have no desire to read that giant wall of text. I'm perfectly content...
Umm what? Please elaborate on how a public figure somehow has less rights to privacy than the average citizen. This guy is well within his legal rights to do what he is doing. You don't have to like it.