As a competitive carbine shooter with 10's of thousands of rounds down range at both heights through the years... it does.
I used to be an absolute guy myself.... swapped to lower 1/3 about 2 years ago... and never going back and don't intend to go higher.
I've dabbled with an Eotech XPS on...
Why zero interest in lower 1/3?
I find 1.6” (ish) over the bore to be a comfortable head position while still maintaining an extremely firm cheek weld.
Unless you’re sporting some headgear+accessories that makes 1.93 (or higher) a necessity… I find those heights to be less practical for...
I’ve seen a rear view shot of that optic. Not that vantage point. Is that imbedded fiber optics? 🤮
I’ve got zero interest in Sig optics. I’d buy RMR’s all day long before trying any of their stuff.
Don’t care for the company or anything that they’ve done outside of Germany.
Meh. Trijicon is letting themselves slip into obsolescence.
I no longer own any RMR’s and only have 2 SRO’s on competition guns. And I won’t be buying anymore of those with the new Holosun 507Comp on the market.
No irons.
This is a USPSA Carry Optics blaster exclusively. If the dot dies... irons would keep me in the game... but not competitively.
This is why we have backup guns for competition.
Due to alignment and lockup, with the optic having only one focal plane and the irons having two... they won’t always line up 100% matched and still have the same POI.
They should be zero’d completely independently.