There's a reason why the m14 and fal only have same platform competitions.
Ah, yes.
Buy a $2,200+ NM or $2k for a loaded.
Send it to SEI to have it fixed, and fitted for $1k+
Put it in a $1k chassis
Get it back, pray to the M14 gods that it shoots under 2.5 moa
Still heavy
Still bulky
Still...
I mean - the handguard is cheap. The ano on the upper looks pretty cheap. No markings on the upper whatsoever is the #1 tactic of cheap fly-by-night receiver companies. Rear lug looks like it had to be sanded down to fit the lower. Could be an issue with the upper or the lower, but going off...
It really is the most uninspired 22 on the market. It's like glock decided to cash in on fanboi's who don't really care about function and what else is on the market. They put no thought in it. Further evidenced by the slides cracking and detonating. They are the only manufacturer that I can...
There are better options for the same money. If you carry a glock and main concern is similar ergos, go for it. Otherwise, sig 322, fn502, ruger mk4, s&w victory, Taurus tx22 are all better options for various reasons.
Still cutting it's teeth in the marketplace. I like it at the 3 twist and have a faxon barrel that has been decent. About 1.5 moa shooter out to 400 running a couple gorilla sub loads. I'll load for it at some point, just haven't had the time. SAAMI kinda knocked the round down a notch not...
Depends on how far you want to go down the rabbit hole and how much $$$ along the way. Quality scope rail, mount, scope and trigger to start. Next, for me, would be a quality chassis or stock.
Vest thing you can do is to ammo and lot test the rifle. Plenty of threads around on this, do won't...