• ODT Gun Show this Saturday! - Click here for info and tickets!

Search results for query: *

  1. Take the guns first, due process second?

    Ah ok so a "release" indicates an agreement between the court and the guardian to the terms the judge sets to release them. That sounds reasonable.
  2. Take the guns first, due process second?

    Yikes.
  3. Take the guns first, due process second?

    That's my understanding, and I would be totally fine with that.
  4. Take the guns first, due process second?

    True, it doesn't say confiscated. That's one of my questions- must they be released, or would they be allowed to stay in jail? Taking firearms to a family member seems risky; how can you ensure that someone might not get them one of those firearms, or another firearm. If it was my kid and they...
  5. Take the guns first, due process second?

    If I was the guardian, would I be able to refuse the release? Seems like spending some time in jail would help them think!
  6. Take the guns first, due process second?

    Yep, that seems the best solution. If they were released I might be able to understand verifying firearms are secured from them, depending on the definition. Yes, your B solution is the best! Still, even kids from "good" homes can say something stupid like that, especially middle school (former...
  7. Take the guns first, due process second?

    Yeah, I would think it would be safer to keep them in jail. Guess they have an ankle monitor, but if they were in jail, that seems it would ensure they couldn't get their hands on a gun, if that is the concern.
  8. Take the guns first, due process second?

    I was reading the Griffin Daily today and on the front page is a story about two middle schoolers being arrested for making threats about shooting up the school. I'm in total agreement for the seriousness of the crime and punishment for these students. However, I became very concerned when...
Back
Top Bottom